A
research vessel carrying scientists and tourists has been trapped for some time
in the Antarctic ice while attempting to recreate Australian explorer Douglas
Mawson’s 1911-13 voyage to Antarctica.
Various icebreakers attempted to reach the ship unsuccessfully and
finally helicopters were used to remove all but the ship’s crew to another
vessel in open water. This rescue
operation prompted one radio talk show host to comment on the apparent irony
that climatologists studying the receding polar ice caps should find themselves
stranded in this position.
And
so the back and forth on the subject of climate change goes. Unfortunately although anecdotal stories such
as this provide interesting, if not entertaining fodder to the discussion it
does little to reduce the acrimony of the debate. And what exactly is the focal point of the
issue? Or is it just that the focal
point seems to shift, depending upon who is pressing the argument. It seems to me that it is imperative to any
honest and critical analysis of the subject that the points of principal
interest be clearly defined and understood.
A
reasonable framework to apply for this purpose may be found within our own
Catholic social teaching. Scripture
imparts to us that God loves and cares for all of creation [Matthew 6: 2-34] and that mankind is the
steward of this creation [Genesis 2: 15]. Pope Benedict, in his 2009 Encyclical Caritas
in Veritate at No 48, teaches that, Nature
is at our disposal not as “a heap of scattered refuse”, but as a gift of the
Creator who has given it an inbuilt order, enabling man to draw from it the
principles needed in order “to till it and keep it”, but that nature should
never be viewed as something more
important than the human person. It
is within this balance that we should consider our course.
Does
“smarty-pants” man have a complete understanding of the inbuilt order of
creation? A little humility is in order
here and we can answer honestly that our grasp of the universe is incomplete. Does Catholic social teaching suggest that
there is an obligation that man should seek a better understanding of this
inbuilt order of creation so that he may be a better steward of it? Yes, I believe that it does. Ongoing study of our world, including its
climate, is therefore a good use of our resources. Further, an effort to increase our
understanding of the effects we humans make on the world by our activities is
likewise a duty we should foster.
No comments:
Post a Comment